{"id":32469,"date":"2009-10-07T16:09:05","date_gmt":"2009-10-07T16:09:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:8888\/wordpress\/georgia_supreme_court_issues_r\/"},"modified":"2024-12-17T15:56:48","modified_gmt":"2024-12-17T20:56:48","slug":"georgia-supreme-court-issues-r","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/georgia-supreme-court-issues-r\/","title":{"rendered":"Georgia Supreme Court Issues Ruling Favorable to Victims of Crime"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This past week, the Georgia Supreme Court issued a ruling that was favorable to victims of crime who have civil tort claims arising out of the criminal acts perpetrated against them.  The Supreme Court held that the statute of limitations is tolled for victims of crime for any claims arising out of the criminal acts perpetrated against them until such time as the criminal prosecution of the perpetrator is terminated.  See Beneke v. Parker, ___ Ga. ___ No. S08G2078, (2009).<br \/>\nWhat is interesting about this new Supreme Court opinion is that our law firm had written an article about the Victim\u2019s Right Statute enacted by the Legislature and codified in O.C.G.A. \u00a7 9-3-99 over one year before this opinion was rendered.  In this article which was published in the Georgia Trial Lawyers magazine \u201cThe Verdict\u201d, our firm had presaged this opinion by stating that it was likely that the statute might protect victims of traffic crimes by tolling the statute of limitations in their cases.  It was pointed out to members of Bar that if they had a case where there client had been victimized by a traffic violations they might be able to circumvent the statute of limitations by relying on the new statute.  We specifically pointed out in our article that the Victim\u2019s Crime Act could be used in cases where there were violations of criminal laws as pertains to the operation of a motor vehicle.<br \/>\nThe lawyer in the Beneke case read our article and used our arguments to win this case for his client.  In the  Beneke v. Parker case, the Supreme Court held that the plain language of O.C.G.A. \u00a7 9-3-99 encompasses a violation of the Uniform Rules of the Road.  The Court wrote to impose a more stringent definition of \u201ccrime\u201d within the context of the statute would render superfluous its language that \u201cthe statute of limitation is tolled from the date of the alleged crime or \u201cthe act\u201d giving rise to such action in tort\u201d until the prosecution or other termination of such crime or \u201cact.\u201d  In short, even a traffic violation which results in criminal charges being filed against the perpetrator can be used under this new statute to toll the statute of limitations for the victim of the crime until such time as the criminal perpetrator\u2019s case has been disposed of in the criminal system.<br \/>\nTo see a copy of our article, please hit the link provided for further detail on the possible impact this new statute may have on you or a member of your family if you are a victim of a crime.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/georgia-supreme-court-issues-r\/#more-32469\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This past week, the Georgia Supreme Court issued a ruling that was favorable to victims of crime who have civil tort claims arising out of the criminal acts perpetrated against them. The Supreme Court held that the statute of limitations is tolled for victims of crime for any claims arising out of the criminal acts [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[44],"class_list":["post-32469","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-personal-injury-wrongful-death","tag-personal-injury"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Georgia Supreme Court Issues Ruling Favorable to Victims of Crime &#8212; Trial Attorney Blog &#8212; October 7, 2009<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"This past week, the Georgia Supreme Court issued a ruling that was favorable to victims of crime who have civil tort claims arising out of the criminal &#8212; October 7, 2009\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/georgia-supreme-court-issues-r\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Georgia Supreme Court Issues Ruling Favorable to Victims of Crime &#8212; Trial Attorney Blog &#8212; October 7, 2009\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"This past week, the Georgia Supreme Court issued a ruling that was favorable to victims of crime who have civil tort claims arising out of the criminal &#8212; October 7, 2009\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Finch McCranie, LLP\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Georgia Supreme Court Issues Ruling Favorable to Victims of Crime &#8212; Trial Attorney Blog &#8212; October 7, 2009","description":"This past week, the Georgia Supreme Court issued a ruling that was favorable to victims of crime who have civil tort claims arising out of the criminal &#8212; October 7, 2009","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/georgia-supreme-court-issues-r\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Georgia Supreme Court Issues Ruling Favorable to Victims of Crime &#8212; Trial Attorney Blog &#8212; October 7, 2009","twitter_description":"This past week, the Georgia Supreme Court issued a ruling that was favorable to victims of crime who have civil tort claims arising out of the criminal &#8212; October 7, 2009","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Finch McCranie, LLP","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/georgia-supreme-court-issues-r\/","url":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/georgia-supreme-court-issues-r\/","name":"Georgia Supreme Court Issues Ruling Favorable to Victims of Crime &#8212; Trial Attorney Blog &#8212; October 7, 2009","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-07T16:09:05+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-17T20:56:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/4c607d19a3fdb947c462210c077ff4a4"},"description":"This past week, the Georgia Supreme Court issued a ruling that was favorable to victims of crime who have civil tort claims arising out of the criminal &#8212; October 7, 2009","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/georgia-supreme-court-issues-r\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/georgia-supreme-court-issues-r\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/georgia-supreme-court-issues-r\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Georgia Supreme Court Issues Ruling Favorable to Victims of Crime"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/","name":"Trial Attorney Blog","description":"Published by Georgia Trial Lawyers \u2014 Finch McCranie, LLP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/4c607d19a3fdb947c462210c077ff4a4","name":"Finch McCranie, LLP","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0ac10eb5fe0f322f70ad7a84f6c73584e7381799013c841fb9f2ecf347e28d71?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0ac10eb5fe0f322f70ad7a84f6c73584e7381799013c841fb9f2ecf347e28d71?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Finch McCranie, LLP"}}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32469","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32469"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32469\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33159,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32469\/revisions\/33159"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}