Rule No. 11 of 12:\tThe successful cross-examiner has the ability to make what appears to be complex become simple.
\nIn order to adhere to this rule, experienced trial counsel knows that they must use language that layman can understand. Using lawyerly language or expansive vocabulary is not the way to go. Counsel must boil down the issues to as few as are possible so that the jury can understand what the issues are and follow the testimony and the relevance of the examination. If counsel becomes too technical and fails to make sure that the testimony being offered can be understood by the average juror then cross-examination will be ineffective. Thus, it is important that trial attorneys use language that everyday people understand and that they use language in such a way as to communicate effectively and directly. If this is done, there is no reason an attorney cannot be a successful cross-examiner.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Rule No. 11 of 12: The successful cross-examiner has the ability to make what appears to be complex become simple. In order to adhere to this rule, experienced trial counsel knows that they must use language that layman can understand. Using lawyerly language or expansive vocabulary is not the way to go. Counsel must boil […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[44],"class_list":["post-32377","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-personal-injury-wrongful-death","tag-personal-injury"],"yoast_head":"\n