{"id":1653,"date":"2007-12-05T14:49:04","date_gmt":"2007-12-05T14:49:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:8888\/wordpress\/defective_medical_device_quest\/"},"modified":"2024-12-17T16:10:26","modified_gmt":"2024-12-17T21:10:26","slug":"defective-medical-device-quest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/defective-medical-device-quest\/","title":{"rendered":"Defective Medical Device Question Before Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The United States Supreme Court  heard arguments yesterday in a case which may have a major impact on lawsuits against medical device makers brought by patients who have been injured by defective products.  The Supreme Court will be asked to consider whether patients can bring lawsuits over defective devices which have been cleared for sale by the Food and Drug Administrations\u2019 approval process.  In this case, a federal appeals court barred a suit which claims a New York man suffered permanent injury when a Medtronic heart catheter burst during a heart procedure.<\/p>\n<p>The decision of the lower court would undercut thousands of lawsuits, including cases over defibrilators made by Medtronic and Boston Scientific Corp. Guidant unit.  The ruling may also shield Medtronic from suits over its recalled Fidelis defibrilator wires.  In 1996, a divided Supreme Court allowed lawsuits over products approved through a separate Food and Drug Administration approval process that provided for fast-track reviews of devices.  The case before the Supreme Court concerns a pre-market approval process which is a more intensive FDA review.<\/p>\n<p>The Bush administration is not surprisingly backing the medical device makers in their argument that the federal pre-market system should preclude claims that companies ought to have done more to ensure safety.<\/p>\n<div class=\"read_more_link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/defective-medical-device-quest\/\"  title=\"Continue Reading Defective Medical Device Question Before Supreme Court\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The United States Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in a case which may have a major impact on lawsuits against medical device makers brought by patients who have been injured by defective products. The Supreme Court will be asked to consider whether patients can bring lawsuits over defective devices which have been cleared for sale [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[44],"class_list":["post-1653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-personal-injury-wrongful-death","tag-personal-injury"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Defective Medical Device Question Before Supreme Court &#8212; Trial Attorney Blog &#8212; December 5, 2007<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The United States Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in a case which may have a major impact on lawsuits against medical device makers brought by &#8212; December 5, 2007\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/defective-medical-device-quest\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Defective Medical Device Question Before Supreme Court &#8212; Trial Attorney Blog &#8212; December 5, 2007\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"The United States Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in a case which may have a major impact on lawsuits against medical device makers brought by &#8212; December 5, 2007\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Finch McCranie, LLP\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Defective Medical Device Question Before Supreme Court &#8212; Trial Attorney Blog &#8212; December 5, 2007","description":"The United States Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in a case which may have a major impact on lawsuits against medical device makers brought by &#8212; December 5, 2007","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/defective-medical-device-quest\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Defective Medical Device Question Before Supreme Court &#8212; Trial Attorney Blog &#8212; December 5, 2007","twitter_description":"The United States Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in a case which may have a major impact on lawsuits against medical device makers brought by &#8212; December 5, 2007","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Finch McCranie, LLP","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/defective-medical-device-quest\/","url":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/defective-medical-device-quest\/","name":"Defective Medical Device Question Before Supreme Court &#8212; Trial Attorney Blog &#8212; December 5, 2007","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-12-05T14:49:04+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-17T21:10:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/4c607d19a3fdb947c462210c077ff4a4"},"description":"The United States Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in a case which may have a major impact on lawsuits against medical device makers brought by &#8212; December 5, 2007","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/defective-medical-device-quest\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/defective-medical-device-quest\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/defective-medical-device-quest\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Defective Medical Device Question Before Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/","name":"Trial Attorney Blog","description":"Published by Georgia Trial Lawyers \u2014 Finch McCranie, LLP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/4c607d19a3fdb947c462210c077ff4a4","name":"Finch McCranie, LLP","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0ac10eb5fe0f322f70ad7a84f6c73584e7381799013c841fb9f2ecf347e28d71?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0ac10eb5fe0f322f70ad7a84f6c73584e7381799013c841fb9f2ecf347e28d71?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Finch McCranie, LLP"}}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1653"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1653\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33518,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1653\/revisions\/33518"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.finchmccranie.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}